tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9091413422901819246.post1437002380945786492..comments2024-03-16T11:08:57.193+02:00Comments on True Romania: Glodeni CastleBlog Leaderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11941925169334096656noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9091413422901819246.post-76909274205157537632011-02-10T12:01:22.072+02:002011-02-10T12:01:22.072+02:00To Anonymous:
Please sign your comment, it isn'...To Anonymous:<br />Please sign your comment, it isn't polite to "hit and run". In the future, I will delete any anonymous comment.<br />My sources were:<br />1. "Satul Glodeni este atestat documentar în anul 1263." (http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glodeni,_Mure%C8%99 AND http://www.erdelyiutazas.hu/romana/telepules/marossarpatak-1014)<br />2. "În dijmele papale, apare însă abia la 13 mai 1319, când regele Carol al Ungariei i-a donat lui Simion, fiul lui Mihail, comite de Şemlacul Mare şi de Caraş, proprietăţi în mai multe sate, printre care şi Glodeni, pentru credinţa lui faţă de rege." (http://www.ziaruldemures.ro/detalii-stire/browse/7/inapoi/eveniment/articol/viitor-incert-pentru-castelul-teleki-din-glodeni.html)<br />"Localitatea apare în 1332 în Registrele de dijmă papală, sub notaţia „Domenic sacerd. de Sarpatak solv.18 banalis antiqua et 8 banalis nova” (C.Suciu DILT , I, p.267)" (http://www.protopopiat.ro/pag_cms_id_122_p_parohia-glodeni.html)<br />3. "Locuitorii acestei comune, români şi unguri, au fost în cursul veacurilor iobagi ai familiei Teleky şi Bornemisza." (http://www.protopopiat.ro/pag_cms_id_122_p_parohia-glodeni.html AND http://www.ziaruldemures.ro/detalii-stire/browse/7/inapoi/eveniment/articol/viitor-incert-pentru-castelul-teleki-din-glodeni.html)<br />As you can see, I have consulted TWO sources for each of three possibly mistakes. What are YOUR sources?Blog Leaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11941925169334096656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9091413422901819246.post-88210530353261455462011-02-08T23:47:07.083+02:002011-02-08T23:47:07.083+02:001. "Glodeni was attested in 1263" - inco...1. "Glodeni was attested in 1263" - incorrect: It was first attested in 1268 and the document is not original, in fact there are serious doubts about its authenticity<br />2. "In the Papal documents, it appears..." - the document in question has nothing to do with the Pope. The original can be found in the National Archives of Hungary, Budapest.<br />3. The Bornemisza family has NEVER had any possessions in the village. There was only one Bornemisza, the husband of the last contess of the upper castle, but then there were no serfs anymore in Transylvania<br />WHERE DO YOU GET THESE INFOS ANYWAY? DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE YOU PUBLISH ANYTHING. ESPECIALLY IF YOU DO IT IN AN INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGEAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com